2024
HowNow
Redesigning HowNow’s
Home Experience to Improve Learning Engagement



AI meets learning

Context
Initial Problem
Learners did not meaningfully engage with content.
Engagement
38% homepage visits with no interaction
Below Target
Continuation
47% of users not resuming learning
Low continuation from homepage
Drop-off
High bounce rate from homepage entry
Users leaving without starting learning
Feature Adoption
Low usage of key modules
Mandatory sections underutilised
This Is What Users Were Actually Looking At
Initial Pemise
Objective
Reduce cognitive overload and guide clear next actions
Drive higher content interaction and retention
Work within existing components and platform architecture
Homepage Audit
I reviewed each element of the existing homepage to understand where it was failing users

Large, visually dominant, but not actionable. It took up prime space without guiding users toward anything meaningful.

No visual distinction from mandatory content. Nothing flagged it as important or time-sensitive

No context, no categorisation, no hierarchy. Every card looked the same regardless of priority.
Reviewing Support Tickets
I reviewed support tickets raised against the homepage over a 30-day period.
20+ tickets per week
Homepage was consistently the highest
ticket-generating area across the platform.

Stakeholder & Customer Inputs
The CS team shared direct feedback they had collected from learners through support conversations.

"I don't know where to start when I log in."

"I keep missing my mandatory training, I just can't find it easily."

"I forgot I even had a course in progress."

"I just log in, find my task, and leave. I don't really scroll or explore."
HYPOTHESIS 1
HYPOTHESIS 2
Engagement Strategy Review
To understand how successful content platforms drive engagement, I studied Netflix, YouTube, and Apple TV.
I focused on how they prioritise content, guide attention, and reduce decision fatigue.

Common behaviours across all three platforms
Prioritise in-progress learning
Surface personalised content early
Group content to reduce decision fatigue
Design Opportunity
✅ Prioritise continuation over exploration
✅ Show relevance before volume
✅ Reduce cognitive load through grouping
Based on the performance signals, stakeholder insights, and learnings from high-engagement content platforms,
I explored multiple structural directions to test how the homepage could better support engagement and clarity.
Concept B
Content-Discovery Focus
What it solves
Large hero section with featured content
Emphasis on content exploration
Limitations
Risked reducing visibility of mandatory/admin-driven modules
Could make the experience feel algorithm-heavy and less structured
Rejected: Partially validated, strong for engagement but risky for business visibility.
Concept C
Balanced Engagement
✅ Clear information hierarchy
✅ Strategic placement of critical user data
The key trade-off was balancing strong personalisation with maintaining visibility of mandatory, business-critical content.
Selected
After selecting the hybrid model, I validated the direction against both business priorities and technical feasibility to confirm it could drive engagement while remaining viable within existing system constraints.
From Business Alignment 💰
Needed to increase engagement and feature adoption
Mandatory content had to remain visible
Homepage had to support overall platform value
The Hybrid model supported both engagement and
business visibility.
From Technical Feasibility 💻
Worked within existing component library
Did not require backend restructuring
Allowed modular layout adjustments
Engineering review confirmed feasibility within
current system constraints.
We selected the Hybrid model because it best balanced engagement goals, business visibility, and technical feasibility.
Based on the selected hybrid direction, I defined three execution principles:
Wireframe Exploration
Internal Validation & Alignment
Before moving to final UI, I reviewed the wireframes with the Product Manager and engineering team.
We aligned on engagement priorities, feature visibility, and technical feasibility. Based on feedback, I adjusted module hierarchy, simplified grouping, and ensured the layout could be built using existing components and data structures.
This step helped reduce implementation risk and strengthened alignment across product and engineering.
Design System & Visual Foundations
The homepage redesign required evolving existing components rather than rebuilding from scratch.
I updated content cards to improve hierarchy and scannability, introduced a more structured banner system to guide attention, and standardised spacing to create a clearer visual rhythm across modules. Typography and contrast were refined to improve accessibility and readability.
All updates were aligned with the existing design system to ensure consistency and engineering feasibility.








Usability Testing
After hi-fi designs, I conducted an unmoderated usability test using Maze with 6 active platform users. Each session lasted around 7 minutes and focused on validating layout and content hierarchy decisions.
Participants were given 3 key tasks:
Resume an in-progress course
Find a mandatory task
Discover new content relevant to their role
Key changes based on findings:
Moved in-progress content higher.
4 out of 6 users missed it in its original position
Reduced banner prominence after it consistently distracted users from key actions
Repositioned mandatory modules after users overlooked them on first scroll
Following the homepage redesign, we observed measurable improvements in user engagement and interaction patterns, validating the design direction.









